Women and water collection rural vs urban areas
I recently came across a report highlighting that in many
developing countries, it is the case that the proportion of women involved in
water collection is close to being equal to men in both rural and urban areas
(Geere, 2017) as shown in figure 1. Interestingly however, this trend is less
significant in Sub-Saharan Africa (with the exception of Mombosa and Kenya) where
in both rural and urban areas, women proportionately are the main bearers of
water. With this finding, I came across an interesting case study in Ghana, which
will provide an insight into the influence of cultural norms tied in with women
in African societies and the influence of socio-economic status affecting the
roles of women in water collection in both rural and urban areas.
Figure 1: Responsibilities of water collection in rural and urban areas
In Kumasi city, the 2nd largest metropolitan areas in
Ghana, there is an increasing need for water to meet the needs for increasing
urbanization and by 2025, Ghana will have reached the limit for water stress
(Quartey, 2014). Socio-economic status significantly determines the role of
women in water collection in the city. Kumasi can be divided into 2 distinct
socio-economic zones, ie. the 1st zone that is characterized by
villas, government and residential settlements consisting of 30% of the city’s
population. Meanwhile, the 2nd zone house the rest of the population
living in informal settlements largely composed of rural-urban migrants from
Northern Ghana (Akumiah, 2007). As such there is a distinct
difference in the role of water collection for women according to housing
types, with reference to a study looking into water management and health in
Kumasi.
In the core of the city where zone 1 is located, priority is
given to satisfying the needs for water, due to major industries operating in
the area and the socio-economic status of households whom are mostly government
official sand politicians and are able to secure water resource with their
ability to pay, women living in such households in the city core are therefore not
dependent on water collection.
In comparison, in the periphery of the city where the informal
settlements are located, ¾ of the population fetch water away from their homes
from shallow wells. This is due to the unsustainable allocation for water
sources, in which public piped water systems lacks connection to many
households and additionally, the lack of money for maintenance for service and the
extorting prices of water sold by water vendors. Hence women and children
living in informal settlements spend most of their day for water collection.
A respondent from a poor household said that “Water is scarce
when one sees women and children with buckets traveling long distance,
spending hours to the source”.
Rural
Ghana
The cultural hindrance on women is even greater in rural areas,
where girls and women are burdened with majority of the time spent on un-paid domestic
activities such as taking care of siblings, cooking, cleaning and especially
fetching water, meanwhile men intensively participate in paid activities. In
total rural Ghanian girls and women spend 43.5 hours in water collection alone,
with this figure increasing with dry seasons where multiple water runs would be
required. Apart from cultural roles, the significant number of hours spent in
water collection in rural Ghana is also attributed by the water infrastructure
available. Figure 2 shows the water sources available from 4 rural towns in a
study on temporal and spatial water patterns in rural Ghana (Kulinkina, 2016).
Although the National Community Water and Sanitation Program
introduced piped water systems in the 1990s, to this date this only accounts
for 16.6% of the rural Ghanian population’s access to water (Kulinkina, 2016).
An interviewee reported that the area was less prone to waterborne diseases
outbreak when relying on river water and there based on local habits (disregarding
water quality) there is also a preference for the taste of river water and hand
dug wells compared to piped sources. Hence, this is also one of the factors
contributing to majority of the population’s reliance on surface water,
self-collected rainwater and hand dug wells as main water sources, which
requires women travelling longer distances of up to an average of 5 miles for
water.
Overall, socio-economic status stratifies the role of women in
water collection in urban areas, where women living in households in central
Ghana water needs are politically prioritized for industries and socio-economically
wealthy households, reducing the role of women in water collection. Whereas in
informal settlements and rural areas, due to unsustainable water sources and
cultural norms, there is a need to travel distances to collect water, in which women
spend majority of their time for water collection. So why do all these hours
spent on water collection matter? Stay tuned for the next post.
This blog is extremely interesting and brings up crucial points to the gender roles problem in Africa. I am wondering if the 43.5 hours women spend on water collection is per week, year or their lives? It seems incredibly unfair for women to have this burden, how would you propose a solution other than piped water supplies for women to collect water?
ReplyDeleteHi Pauline, thank you for your comment. The 43.5 hours spent in water collection refers to a week. The first step to increasing women's access to collect water stems from improving sanitation habits by providing education into Water Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) because these variables are highly interconnected, without the provision of sanitation facilities such as latrines, the poor disposal of human waste management will create a vicious cycle of contaminated water sources for collection despite new wells being constructed. This should be followed by increasing their participation in water resource management in national policies to construct and maintain water facilities, such as protected dug wells.
DeleteThanks for this exchange. The scale of the burden of water collection, in some instances, is obscene but it tragically remains - well documented.
ReplyDelete